The question remains: is ChatGPT a helpful helper or a dishonest cheat? One thing is for certain: the stakes are high, and the future of AI at Stanford hangs in the balance.”
Some argue that using ChatGPT to complete assignments is a violation of the Honor Code, while others claim it’s simply a tool for idea generation. “ChatGPT, a popular artificial intelligence tool, has recently sparked a debate on campus about its role in academic integrity. It not only acts as a robotic study buddy, but can also write lengthy essays on almost any subject and generate ideas and outlines for projects.įor example, when asked for a “witty opening paragraph for a Stanford Daily article about ChatGPT and the Stanford Honor Code,” the chatbot produced the following: When OpenAI released the tool, it quickly took off, attracting over a million users in under a week and drawing widespread attention for its ability to generate almost any level of text-based fodder using technology from a field of machine learning called natural language processing. Stanford dropout Sam Altman is among the company’s co-founders. The chatbot was created by San Francisco-based artificial intelligence company OpenAI and launched in November.
“In most courses, unpermitted aid includes AI tools like ChatGPT.” “Students are expected to complete coursework without unpermitted aid,” wrote spokesperson Dee Mostofi. Whether the new technology will necessitate a revision of the Honor Code, the University’s standards for academic integrity, remains to be seen: A University spokesperson confirmed that the Board of Judicial Affairs is aware of and monitoring these emerging tools. And according to an informal poll conducted by The Daily, a large number of students have already used ChatGPT on their final exams. Some professors have already overhauled their courses in anticipation of how students might use the chatbot to complete assignments and exams. Stanford students and professors alike are grappling with the rise of ChatGPT, a chatbot powered by artificial intelligence, and the technology’s implications for education.
0 kommentar(er)
